Dr.
Landrum is a businessman turned educator and author. As founder of the
Chuck E. Cheese chain of restaurants, he was involved in creative entrepreneurial
ventures and became fascinated with innovative behavior. His doctoral
dissertation on the innovator personality launched his life-long research
into the psychology under-pinning success. He believes that to be successful,
one must be different.
As
an authority in the psychology of success, Dr. Landrum is a widely sought-after
speaker who has appeared on radio and television throughout the United
States. He is a professor in the graduate and undergraduate schools
at International College in Naples, Florida. Dr. Landrum and his wife
Diedra spend their time between their homes in Naples, Florida and Lake
Tahoe.
|
 |
The
following article has been exerpted from Dr. Gene Landrum's newest book,
Empowerment: The Competitive
Edge in Sports, Business & Life.
Have you ever felt that you didn’t
fit in? When you were in high school or college, did you feel excluded
from the “in group”–that inner circle of people at the
center of a social microcosm around whom everyone else was in orbit? Have
you sometimes wondered why you weren’t accorded by your colleagues
a level of respect that you deserve? Have your opinions and perspectives
often been at odds with those around you? If your answer to any of these
questions is “yes,” then you are in good company. Most of
the world’s eminent in all walks of life, were significantly different
from others. They were different in their personalities, beliefs, behaviors
and perspectives, and it was this difference that spawned their exceptionality.
The superstars in the human cosmos who revolutionized science, technology,
business and sports were virtually all renegades who differed dramatically
from the norm, destroying accepted beliefs and creating new paradigms
that changed forever the nature of their enterprise. Philosopher Friedrich
Nietzsche acknowledging this truth asserted in Thus Spake Zarathustra,
“Whoever wants to be the creator of good and evil must first be
an annihilator and break values…but that is being creative.”
In most cases, the potential of these superstars was not recognized until
they reached exceptional levels of achievement; in many cases their opinions
and aspirations were ridiculed, and in some cases they, themselves, were
persecuted for their difference. En route to eminence, these renegades
faced opposition, discrimination and denigration. Their ability to persevere
was empowered by regarding their difference as an asset, rather than a
liability. They trusted their instincts and marched to the tune of their
own drummer. Valuing their difference from others enabled them to push
through adversity and reach new heights never before imagined. In so doing,
they blazed the trail for the generations to follow, leaving their footprints
in the sands of time.
What Drives Us to Fit In?
From the time we are born, society gives us guidelines to follow, indicating
which behaviors are acceptable and which are unacceptable. Ralph Waldo
Emerson explained in his Essays: First Series:
Society everywhere is in conspiracy against the manhood
[and womanhood] of every one of its members…The virtue in most request
is conformity. Self-reliance is its aversion. [Society] loves not realities
and creators, but names and customs.
A system of rewards and punishments are established to
encourage us to serve and support the existing social order. This structured
indoctrination is a necessary part of building a social order that allows
for a stable and sustainable civilization. Without this structure, anarchy
would prevail. Indeed, it is the indoctrinated multitude who form the
backbone of a society, maintaining the social structure and perpetuating
its values. However, this pervasive indoctrination exacts a toll on the
autonomy of the individual that becomes evident early in a child’s
life.
Childhood educator and psychologist Paul Torrance said, “Most kids
begin life with a creative spark, but have it knocked out of them by the
4th grade.” Schools, like most institutions, promote the status
quo. Don’t rock the boat. Sit and do what I say. Don’t be
different. If you aren’t prepared to program your own journey, it
will be programmed for you and that program is for journeys into orthodoxy
and conventionality.
By the time they reach puberty, most children have become accustomed to
surrendering their individuality to the collective will. We see this most
transparently in the behavior of adolescents in their peer group. Insecure
in their quest to assert their independence from the adult world, these
youngsters follow slavishly the behaviors and fashion dictates of a harshly
judgmental and ruthless peer group. It’s a mini-society, not unlike
that depicted in Goldring’s Lord of the Flies, that punishes
difference with ostracism, ridicule and sometimes violence. These pre-teens
and teenagers learn quickly what brand names are acceptable in clothing
and what behaviors are considered “cool.” Individuals violate
these norms at their own peril.
Submission to group norms follows these adolescents into adulthood, residing
quietly beneath a veneer of confidence as they age. The workplace reinforces
the importance of fitting in. Those who are not perceived as team players
are regarded as mavericks and either purged from the staff or passed over
for promotion. The contestants on Donald Trump’s television production
The Apprentice who are not regarded as team players are shown
the door and told, “You’re fired!” Similarly the individualists
on The Apprentice: Martha Stewart are dismissed with the tagline,
“You just don’t fit in.” Such are the punishments that
encourage us to conform.
In addition to punishments for non-compliance, there are considerable
rewards that society offers those who move with the current of accepted
practice. Those who take this path of least resistance are less likely
to become embroiled in a life of conflict with friends, associates and
the establishment. Their lives are more predictable and less encumbered
with struggle than the lives of those who march to their own tune. Monetary
rewards, elevated status and social acceptability often accrue to those
who perform well as part of the herd. Through these incentives, society
gradually comes to own their soul the way that Mephistopheles bought the
soul of Faust.
At What Price?
Hidden within these rewards is an insidious trap. With the gradual accumulation
of relationships and material possessions comes an increased vulnerability
that is felt as a deep-seated fear. It is a fear of losing the money and
the material possessions that have become the surrogate for one’s
original goals and aspirations. It is a fear that is gradually transformed
into a dull pervasive ennui that is linked to the potential loss of the
love of a spouse, parent, child or friend–and ultimately, the loss
of self-esteem. This is the conundrum that Bernard Levin, columnist of
the Times of London, expressed (as quoted in Ferguson, p. 40):
Countries like ours are full of people who have all the material comforts
they desire, yet lead lives of quiet (and at times noisy) desperation,
under-standing nothing but the fact that there is a hole inside them and
that however much food and drink they pour into it, however many motorcars
and television sets they stuff it with, however many well-balanced children
and loyal friends they parade around the edges of it…it aches.
The gradual surrender of one’s individuality brings with it a benign
acceptance of imposed limitations and an abandonment of the hopes and
dreams of youth. The idealism and optimism seen in early life eventually
give way to the pessimism and cynicism evident in the later years, taking
with it the passion that makes life exciting. The jaded and the disillusioned
are the people Henry David Thoreau observed 150 years ago when he said,
“The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation.”1 In trading
their individuality for comfort, the masses have lost the very passion
for life that is needed for high achievement and, more importantly, the
joy that psychologists call self-actualization. Very few people
escape this enculturation and even fewer march to the tune of their own
drummer. Why do so few people escape the early indoctrination that dooms
them to an unfulfilled life? The answer is seen in the behavior of other
animal species.
The Pike Syndrome
The high priests in every field of human endeavor speak about doing things
“by the book.” Who wrote the book? In every endeavor, “the
book” is in continuous revision, driven by breakthroughs made by
those who actually play outside the book. The masses take the book as
gospel. Slavish adherence to the book is referred to in business psychology
as the Pike Syndrome. In an experiment with pike (a fresh-water
fish), a glass barrier was placed between the fish and their food. When
the fish tried to get to the food they hit the glass. After repeated failures,
the fish stopped trying for the food. Surprisingly, when the barrier was
removed they still refused to swim to the food. Early enculturation has
led most of humanity to suffer from the Pike Syndrome –forever inhibited
from the pursuit of their dreams by an invisible “glass” barrier
of convention.
The Pike Syndrome molds us to believe we know what can and can’t
be done. Before 1954, it was generally believed that running the mile
in less than 4 minutes was not humanly possible. However, Roger Bannister,
who had frequently run a quarter of a mile in less than one minute while
a student at Oxford, visualized combining four such runs in succession.
The result was his famous 3-minute-59-second mile. Once people realized
it was possible, running the mile in less than 4 minutes became commonplace.
Bannister’s triumph shows clearly that the greatest barriers we
encounter in life are those that are self-imposed. Victims of the Pike
Syndrome would rather starve than go where the glass barrier threatens
failure. Such negative inner beliefs prove debilitating.
Abnormal Deeds Are Done by Abnormal People
Normal people achieve normally and abnormal people achieve abnormally.
This is a fundamental truth: to be special, we must be different. Abnormal
people are those who are abnormally driven, abnormally tenacious, abnormally
competitive and abnormally passionate. If you aren’t willing to
go where the pack isn’t, you are not likely to make your mark in
the world and you will become part of the pack.
What differentiates the superstar from the also-rans is freedom of thought
and action. Superstars are less constrained by inner limits to their success.
Jim Thorpe and Babe Didrikson Zaharias, two of the greatest athletes who
ever lived, never questioned their ability or put any limit on their achievements.
Both were free spirits who wandered unfettered and unsupervised as children.
Thorpe ran away from home at a very young age and spent months alone in
the wilderness. Who could have imagined that this solitary rebel who resisted
structure and instruction would reach the highest levels of success in
Olympic track and field? Babe Zaharias also grew up unfettered, running
away from her Texas home for the circus in California when still a teen
and indulging her appetite for risk by jumping off moving freight trains.
The Texan Tornado bowled 200 the first time she tried because she saw
no limits. When banned from playing amateur golf, she shrugged and went
on tour playing exhibitions.
Superstars transcend the norm both mentally and emotionally. All have
a prescient sense of destiny without limits. They don’t know they
can’t, so consequently they do. Such a mental
fix outside reality allowed Babe Ruth to hit not only more home runs than
anyone ever thought possible but to hit more than almost every other entire
team in the American League.
The Renegade Attitude
The eminent in almost every field of human endeavor are those who march
to the tune of their own drummer. These superachievers are renegades who
live life on the edge, energized and empowered by their unrelenting struggle
toward their goals. They are never predictable. When it is noon, traditionalists
want to eat; the eminent may eat if it fits their fancy. Sunday night
is a time for rest and relaxation for most, but for the superstar, Sunday
night is just one more opportunity to hone skills. When opportunity strikes,
the superstar will be there, willing to play the game no matter the time
or day.
Mavericks live outside convention. They seldom follow slavishly the instructions
of a coach, preferring to take the coach’s instructions under advisement.
Though they may masquerade as team players and may give credit to teammates,
when it comes to crunch time they listen only to their own counsel. Though
Michael Jordan’s coaches thought he listened intently to them, he
confessed shortly after his retirement that he seldom listened to a coach
in his life. He told biographer Bob Green (p. 231):
I never follow along. I'm never paying attention to what they are
telling the team. I don't think the coaches are aware I'm not listening.
I'm looking at them, but my mind is totally somewhere else. I don't want
to hear it.
Off-the-wall Dennis Rodman of the champion Chicago Bulls is an iconoclast,
actually pushing the envelope of eccentricity. A careful look at the demeanors
of Rodman and Michael Jordan reveals that they march to the tunes of similar
drummers. Neither listens to his coach. Neither drives within speed limits.
Neither dresses conventionally. Both love to gamble. However, they differ
from each other in their respect for other people. Rodman is radical and
eccentric, appearing in drag and flouting the status quo. Jordan, in contrast,
projects the flashy persona of Armani and Lamborghini. Rodman uses shock
to get attention; Jordan uses winning and power to make his mark. Both
are cocky, flamboyant and passionate about life.
The Inner Voice of the Individualist
In your quest to achieve excellence–athletic or otherwise–you
will be advised, coached, denigrated and praised. Traditional beliefs
will be used as a basis for the coaching and the advice will generally
be given in good faith. However, the new breakthroughs will be made by
those who move outside the accepted techniques and keep counsel with their
instincts. These are the rugged individualists who become the superstars.
Individualists have a strong sense of self that psychologists call self-efficacy.
(I will address this in more detail in Chapter 6.) Without such a strong
inner belief system it is impossible to function effectively outside the
mainstream. Operating outside convention, these visionaries tend to see
what others do not, relying heavily on an inner voice that speaks without
the prejudice of tradition. They seek opportunities and pursue life’s
possibilities while others are following the well-trodden path of conventional
thought. The visionary is willing to live life unfettered, avoiding the
quagmire of the status quo. Traditionalists see visionaries as defiant
or even eccentric because they see the world through a different lens.
Unfortunately in today’s lexicon, non-conformity is often associated
with lawless rebellion and criminal behavior and hence portrayed in a
negative light. Yet, it is the non-conformists who have spawned the ideas
captured in great literature, brilliant science and powerful technologies.
Most non-conformists are merely chasing their dreams and surfing the waves
of triumph and defeat.
Self-empowerment begins with valuing your uniqueness–your difference
from the masses. It’s not about being eccentric, perverse or different
for the sake of being different, but rather, listening to your inner passions,
your dreams and the motivations that give you goose bumps. It’s
about risking failure, rebounding from defeat and persevering through
your inner limits and external constraints.
Resistance to free thinking has been the norm since Socrates was poisoned
for teaching the young to question traditional beliefs. Those who aspire
to high achievement must value their difference–that is the hallmark
of all high achievers. |
|